News
Months after the National Institutes of Health paused key grant-review meetings that are required to approve funding, those meetings are now steadily getting back on track.. As STAT reported last week ...
NIH resumes grant reviews after two-week pause, along with some communications and travel Changes signal a relaxing of certain Trump administration restrictions at health agencies Manage alerts ...
A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary ...
Each year there are about 2,600 meetings involving some 28,000 scientists, doctors, administrators and other expert reviewers. Their decisions keep the NIH funding flowing to more than 300,000 ...
The NIH — the largest source of research funding in the United States — temporarily halted grant-review panels as it navigated Trump’s sweeping orders and a communications pause, plunging ...
In an effort to keep good peer reviewers coming back, the National Institutes of Health is letting "permanent" reviewers, who typically serve for four years on chartered study sections, submit their ...
Hosted on MSN4mon
The NIH’s Grant Terminations Are ‘Utter and Complete Chaos’ - MSNTypically, each NIH grant is shepherded by a team of officials, including at least one program officer, who oversees its scientific components, and a grants-management officer, who handles the budget.
Funding for new grants also slowed to a trickle after the NIH halted grant application review meetings in January. At Duke, NIH grant and contract award notices plummeted, dropping from 166 in ...
“For young career scientists like my bosses, these big NIH grants are really important for getting started,” she said. Catherine said she may reconsider her aspiration to pursue an MD-Ph.D. — a degree ...
The typical NIH grant pays a nearly 30% rate for indirect costs − about $9 billion of the NIH’s $35 billion in research grants in 2023. At Harvard and Yale, however, the rate approaches 70% .
The grant was canceled after a change in NIH policy to not “prioritize research activities that focus on gaining scientific knowledge on why individuals are hesitant to be vaccinated and/or ...
So he went to the NIH Center for Scientific Review (CSR) — the body that oversees grant applications — and got access to the reviews of almost 19,000 proposals evaluated in 2005.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results