Originally published by our partners at The19th on June 27, 2025. The Supreme Court sided last Friday with a group of Maryland parents who object to their children reading LGBTQ+-inclusive books ...

SCOTUS decision in Mahmoud v. Taylor, one of its blockbuster cases from 2025, largely rested on two parental rights cases ...

The case involved a school district in Virginia, where right-wing parents were abusing the “opt-out” system meant to allow ...

With his majority opinion in Mahmoud v. Taylor, Alito gave bigoted parents a big, fat kiss—and changed the nature of public ...

In a statement, Jonathan Keller, the president of the California Family Council, called the majority decision “a direct ...

While not definitive, the decision signals the justices’ inclination to see religious parents succeed in their two-year legal ...

Deadline: White House” legal analyst Jordan Rubin answers your questions about the Supreme Court, Trump administration lawsuits and other issues.

Alito had to contort the meaning of canonical Supreme Court doctrine so that he could either ignore established precedent or ...

The U.S. Supreme Court handed a victory Friday to Montgomery County parents who object, for religious reasons, to the school system’s use of LGBTQ+-themed books in classrooms, saying parents should ...

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that parents have a right to withdraw their children from public school classes when stories with LGBTQ+ themes are being discussed.  Writing for the court’s ...

In Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Supreme Court sided June 27 with a group of Maryland parents who said they wanted to opt their ...

The 6-3 decision Friday in a case brought by parents in Maryland comes as certain books are increasingly being banned from ...