For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict ...

Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...

N.J., that ban anti-abortion activists from approaching someone entering an abortion clinic, sometimes dubbed “sidewalk ...

Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, disagreed. The cities said the laws were passed to address disturbing behavior from ...

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying that the precedent deserved a fresh look since the court ...

Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito ...

The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and ...

At issue was a 25-year precedent that allows local governments to create protest-free buffer zones around all health-care ...

The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken the cases. Anti-abortion groups, as well as a number of Republican attorneys general, wanted the justices to use the challenges ...

The majority did not explain their reasoning for turning down the appeals, as is typical, but two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence ... But anti-abortion activists said the measures ...